COLLECTING MAGAZINES: What to Look For and How to Determine Value?

COLLECTING MAGAZINES

What to Look For and How to Determine Value?

 

Look (January 25, 1955)

         The hobby of collecting magazines can be fun, educational, and rewarding. One needs to know which magazines are prime collectibles, which are presently very valuable and which have potentials to become very valuable in the near future, and which are worthless and are just gathering dust. Of course, some worthless magazines may have value depending on the kinks and fixations of the collector.
 

          My being a magazine collector was brought about by circumstances. My dad bought and collected magazines, from the 1950s up to his death in 1966, and the subscriptions continued up to the 1970s. My dad, who was Chinese, learned how to speak Tagalog and English through these media. I, on the other hand, was a freelance writer and crossword puzzle contributor for different publications since I was in fourth year high school.
 

           Every time my crossword puzzle or article was published, I would ask a complimetary copy of the particular magazine, and also buy one, if I have the extra money, for a duplicate. That was my sort of vainglorious fetish. As time passed, I realized that I got literally tons of magazines filed up in my room.

          We transfered residence several times and, though I regret it, I need to leave much of my collections of magazines (and comics) behind. Up until 2010, I still have about three thousand magazines in my possession. Then came the Habagat flood. About three large carton-boxful of magazines, those at the bottom of the pile, were ruined beyond saving.

 



Bulaklak, Hiyas ng Tahanan (December 30, 1953), Liwayway (November 9, 1970)
and Fotoplay (February 1969)



          I was disheartened because they include most of the oldest magazines and some of my priced favorites. I thought some of them, which include issues of foreign magazines like Liberty, Life, Look, People Today and Time, and local magazines like Bulaklak, Liwayway and Fotoplay, were really valuable. Until a collector-friend of mine told me they weren’t really that valuable. Except for a couple of issues containing certain articles, none of the ruined magazines was worth more than a hundred pesos each.



Mabuhay, Aliwan(g) ng Bayan (May 15, 1933)

          Since then I started researching and learning about magazine collecting and set my own method of determining value and collectibility.


          Aside from the premier issues and the really vintage ones, the value of a magazine is determined by several factors: rarity, condition, contents, who’s on the cover, and intrinsic factors such as historicity, cult status, thematic appeal, background anecdote, etc.

          Let’s dissect these factors one by one, but I’ll try to concentrate on magazines that were printed, distributed and circulated in the Philippines.

 

MAIDEN AND LAST ISSUES

First (December 1999) and last (September 2013) issues
of Atlas TV Guide (initially titled TV Star),
showing both front and back covers

          The maiden or premier or first issues, by concept, are the targets of collectors, but are not and will not always have high value. The maiden issue will accumulate intrinsic value as time passed and it gained vintage, and as the magazine’s succeeding issues becomes popular and relevant to public interest. All the other factors, rarity, condition, contents, who’s on the cover, contribute to the value of the maiden issue. Also, the value of every maiden issue depends on the genre that a collector collects. The first issue, for example, of Movie Fan and Artista will be very valuable to one who collects magazines about movies and movie actors, and the first issue of Censored, Dalaga, Pinoy Playboy and Playhouse will be valuable to one who collects sex and erotica-oriented magazines, and so on.

          The last issue of a magazine can also be very valuable, especially when it has a cult following. The value doubles when the printing is limited to a few hundreds or a couple of thousands, and even more if it’s privilege print, which are given only to loyal followers.
 

VINTAGE


          Vintage, in plain explanation, refers to the age of the magazine. As a general rule, the older the magazine, the greater the vintage value. This, however, doesn’t mean that all old magazines have high value. Again, it will depend of the other factors combined. What vintage does is multiply the value determined by the other factors combined. 



Libertine Men’s Magazine,

the only issue that came off the press

(No date tag,
probably circulated middle to third quarter of 2008).

          The practice of recent publishing outfits, especially of the local adult men’s magazines, of not putting dates on their pages so that they can reprint the issue any time demands go up, is actually devaluing its vintage factor. There’s one local magazine that I know of that had only one issue published and closed shop – a men’s magazine titled Libertine. Being the only issue, it would have started accumulating value by now, but it didn’t. The reason – it doesn’t have a date tag, not even the year it was printed. The exact date tag in a magazine is very important because it not only determines vintage but also records historical significance.

RARITY

Which first issue has a higher collectibility value?
FHM Philippines (March 2000) or 18 (September 2000).

          One most important factor in a magazine’s collectibility is “how rare it is?” How many were printed? How many survived vintage? Again, the rarer it is, the more it is valuable. To be considered rare the number of prints, generally, should not exceed ten thousand. That is why magazines which are Sunday supplements of daily newspapers very very seldom will have real value. The same holds true for widely-circulated magazines.

          Let’s put it this way: You have the first issue of FHM Philippines in yours possession, in mint condition, still inside its plastic container. Do you think its worth your lunch money? No, it isn’t. Why? For the simplest reason that it is not rare. The sheer number of copies printed and circulated render its future value to almost zero percentage of increment. Plus, it’s a well-known franchise title, and many people kept and save them, and if ever they decide to resale them, there are too many in the market, no rarity factor. A relatively unknown men’s magazine, say Playhouse, 18 or Gentlemen’s Magazine (GM), with only around ten thousand printed copies or less will be exceedingly more valuable to collect.
 

COVER



Orig Showbiz Magazine (April 23, 1983).
All the three celebrities on the cover,
Fernando Poe Jr, Julie Vega and Claudia Zobel (inset),
had already passed away.

          A magazine also gets its value from its cover. What or who is in the cover. If it’s a unique art work by a well-known artist, then you’ll have points on that. If it’s a masterpiece never before shown except in that magazine cover, then your points triples. If the artist had already passed away, it’ll be a highest pointer.

          If it’s a celebrity cover, a lot of factors are to be considered and weighed: Background accounts and anecdotes, popularity, status, achievements, controversies, scrupples, scandals, etc. This may sound unbelievable, but do you know that magazines having Assunta de Rossi on the cover is more valuable than one with Marian Rivera; one with Claudia Zobel more valuable than one with Alma Moreno; and one with basketball player Bernard Fabiosa than one with boxer Manny Pacquiao? Without talking about politics, a Philippine Free Press issue having former President Ferdinand Marcos on the cover is probably more than a thousand times more valuable than a Time magazine with former President Cory Aquino on the cover. This is because of the combination of the magazine issue’s rarity and intrinsic value.

          Similarly, magazine with covers featuring celebrities that had already passed away are also sought after by collectors. Somehow, the value of these particular magazine issues increase after the celebrity died. Some sort of “afterlife effect.”
 

CONTENTS AND INTERESTS

          Collectors hunt for magazines with pioneering and groundbreaking, as well as feisty and nasty contents: New discoveries, historical accounts, stolen shots of celebrities, tales of real-life adventures and scandals, first publication of a celebrity’s life story, first publication of a celebrity’s baby pictures, first publication of a novel or comics story that became a hit (especially those of famous authors and illustrators), etc.

          The idea of incorporating vernacular comic (komiks) series inside the magazine pages is very well founded. It increases the magazine’s potentials and sales, as well as collectibility.

Darna magazine covers:
Kislap (March 22, 1973), Sosyal! (December 23, 1986), True Horoscope Stories (December 19, 2003),
and Inside Showbiz (May 2005).

           There are collectors with very specific picks and interests. I, for one, collects magazines both with covers and contents about Darna and about Angel Locsin. A collector-friend of mine looks for magazines that have different weird and unique print ads. Another one, collects anything  and everything about Regine Velasquez. And still another is fond of collecting magazines with "look-alikes" on the covers.
 

          Thematic collectors amass magazines containing items and articles that interest them: unique ads, recipes, health tips, sports items, animal pictures, car pictures, nude pictures, eroticas, fashion displays, write-ups about their favorite movie stars or sports heroes, environmental articles, and even caricatures, gossips, jokes and bloopers.

Graphic (September 15, 1971), Modern Romances & True Confessions (July 5, 1977),
Sports World (January 22-26, 1983), Toyz for the Boyz (June 2005), and Moviestar (August 27, 2007).

 

          There are magazines that have double or triple features, showcasing sexy pictorials and celebrity profile, illustrated romance stories with sports and fashion sections, sports and celebrity news, cars and sexy girls, celebrity interviews and gossips, etc., which has more followers.
 

SHORT RUNS



First (January 2008), and seventh and last (February 2009) issues

of Spiff, showing both front and back covers.

          Some people try to collect and complete short-run magazines: Libertine (only 1 issue), Playhouse (only two legitimate issues and two retitled Playhouse Blue issues), Pinoy Erotica (only 3 issues), Good Life (only 6 issues), Spiff (only 7 issues), Metro Timesweek (only 10 issues), Men’s Edge (only 12 issues), Gintong Mariposa (only 20 issues), Men’s World (less than 30 issues), 10 Magazine (less than 50 issues), Moneysaver (less than 70 issues), Pinay Digest (less than 100 issues), MOD Girl, (less than 150 issues), Atlas TV Guide (only 165 issues), Savvy (less than 200 issues), etc. Endeavoring collecting the entire set, from first to last issue, is considered by collectors as an "achievement." Still others collect only all the special issues of their favorite magazine, such as anniversary, Christmas, independence Day, Lenten, New Year, etc. 
  

  

CONDITION

 

          Of course a would-be collector also looks on the condition of the magazines. However, although wears and tears, smudges and stains, cringes and cuts, and discolorations diminish the value of any paper collectibles, the other factors come into play to determine their overall collectivity and worth. For instance, a worn-out 1980s already defunct sports magazines like Sports World featuring on the cover a deceased celebrity, or like Sports Weekly featuring a picture of a retired athlete, or a "For Adult Only" magazine, Dalaga, is worth more than a mint-condition Cosmopolitan Philippines or Playboy Philippines first issue. Here, vintage, rarity, cover value and intrinsic factors prevail over the bad condition of the magazine. Serious collectors know how to discern and are not discourage in buying paper collectibles that may seemed already worthless to newbie collectors.

 

CONDITION LEVELS OF PRINTED PAPER COLLECTIBLES

10 – MINT

9 – NEAR-MINT

8 – EXCELLENT

7 – NEAR-EXCELLENT

6 – VERY GOOD

5 – GOOD

4 – VERY FINE

3 – FINE

2 – FAIR

1 – POOR 



One of two unique covers of the first issue of Playhouse (January 1, 2008),
in MINT condition (Level 10).

MINT – As the word suggest, it is of pristine condition, both cover and inside pages.

 

Mr. & Ms. (June 8, 2004), with Oyo Boy Sotto and Angel Locsin on the front cover,
in NEAR-MINT condition (Level 9).

NEAR-MINT – No stains or penmarks anywhere in the magazine. May have very slight discoloration especially when it is more than 10 years old. May have minor cringes on edges. All pages must be intact.

MOD Girl (August 2006),
in EXCELLENT condition (Level 8).

EXCELLENT – Minor stress lines on the spine, minor cringes, creases and smudges, slight discoloration on cover and yellowing of inside pages. All pages must be intact.

Babae (November 8, 1983),
in NEAR-EXCELLENT condition (Level 7).

NEAR-EXCELLENT – Visible stress lines on the spine, cringes, creases, smudges are also visible on the cover. Discoloration on the cover and yellowing inside pages with few stains. No missing pages nor cut pieces.

Bulaklak at Paruparo (May 16, 1979),
with Emma Henry and Dindo Fernando (both deceased) on the cover,
in VERY GOOD condition (Level 6).

VERY GOOD – Smudges, creases, and few wrinkle and transverse lines. Cringes on the edges of both cover and inside pages. Cover page may be loose, pronounced discoloration of cover and yellowing of inside pages, but everything is still intact.

Liwayway (February 5, 1944), Japanese Occupation Era issue,
in GOOD condition (Level 5).

GOOD – Pronounced wear-and-tear and discoloration can already be seen on cover, with smudges, cringes, wrinkles all over. Cover may also be detached, but still intact as well as the inside pages.

Sports Weekly (October 23, 1981),
in VERY FINE condition (Level 4).

VERY FINE – Tears, cuts and pronounced cringes on the the spine and edges. Pronounced stains, discoloration and yellowing, and may have torn inside pages or cut outs, but generally still intact with no missing page.

Sports World (February 13, 1982),
with Maritess de Joya on the cover with Lydia de Vega (inset),
in FINE condition (Level 3).

FIND – Pronounced wear-and-tear, wrinkles, smudges and discolorations all over. Cuts and missing bits can be observed. Blackening or browning of inside pages. May have one or two missing pages, a few may not be readable.

Prime Weekly Edition (December 17, 1987),
with Ynez Veneracion look-alike Aurora Reyes Sta. Ana on the cover,
in FAIR condition (Level 2).

FAIR – Cover detached and may be separated. Pronounced wear-and-tear and discoloration as well as bleaching all over. Tears and wrinkles all over the cover and inside pages. Blackening or browning of inside pages. May have one to four missing pages. Some pages may not be readable because of bleaching, blackening or browning.

MOD Filipina (October 16, 1987), Chinese Special issue,
in POOR condition (Level 1).

POOR – Cover detached, separated or torn. Pronounced severe wear-and-tear all over. The magazine may still be collectible for one reason or another, but as the word suggest, it is in poor condition. Most pages should still be readable. This may only have value if it contains something that interest the collector.
 

Given a choice, which magazine do you think a collector will choose?
Cosmopolitan Philippines 10th Anniversary Issue (June 2007) with well-known actress Katrina halili
on the cover having a condition level 9 (NEAR-MINT),
or Dalaga (August 1985) with a relatively unknown starlet Dia Diamante
on the cover having a condition level of only 3 (FINE).

 

NOTE: Level 2 (FAIR) and Level 1 (POOR) magazines may look dilapidated, but there are serious collectors that may still find something interesting in them that they collect, such as an interview with their favorite film star or athlete, or a rare picture of a starlet, or a caricature drawn by a legendary artist. So, don’t throw them away yet. They might be worth more than those bargain 18, Candy, RED, FHM Philippines and Playboy Philippines issues you see on Booksale.

 

INTRINSIC VALUE

          This is something that only serious collectors take into consideration. Some collectors value cover more than contents. To others, on the other hand, it doesn’t matter how bad the condition of the magazine as long as all the contents are intact. In a sense, the intrinsic value translates to collectibility. Each collector has his own “gut feel” for a particular magazine. Each collector has his own interest, his own thematic preference, his own quirks and fetishes. Thanks to this, magazines transfer hands through selling and trading between collectors.

A combination of intrinsic factors gives magazines with Assunta de Rossi on the cover,
10 Magazine (December 2002) and Mr. & Ms. (May 13, 2003),
more collectibility value than that of Marian Rivera,
Bannawag (January 2, 2012) and FHM Philippines (January 2013).

          To better understand what intrinsic value is, allow me to point some examples: Above, I mentioned that a magazine having Assunta de Rossi on the cover is more valuable than one with Marian Rivera. With due respect to Marian Rivera’s fans, this is because rarity is more important than popularity in magazine collecting. Furthermore, background accounts about the life of the celebrity on the cover also add collectibility value. Assunta de Rossi used to play and pose “sexy” in movies and magazine pictorials respectively. Suddenly during her rise to fame, she decided to tie the not with an equally well-known personality, Congressman Jules Ledesma. Then disappeared from the limelight. Similarly, that is also what happened to Christina Gonzales. Such accounts and anecdotes make their magazine covers much sought after by collectors. That is intrinsic value.

No politics, it’s for real.
A Philippine Free Press issue (April 15, 1989) featuring the Marcos Family on the cover
is more than a thousand times more valuable than a Time “Woman of the Year” issue (January 5, 1987)
 with Cory Aquino on the cover.

          A Philippine Free Press issue having the Marcos Family on the cover is a thousand times more valuable than a Time magazine with President Aquino on the cover. Why? In the particular example shown above, it was well-established that during those times, the Philippine Free Press was known as “critical” of the Marcoses. Yet, the magazine featured the entire Marcos family on the front cover. This was also the time when coup d’etat attempts against the Cory regime persist. The public, and that includes magazine collectors, are so intrigued. On the other side, the Cory Aquino cover Time issue has almost zero collectibility value because it was widely circulated and the information it contain are already public knowledge through radio and TV broadcast, so it does not have any intrinsic value at all. While both may have historical significance, it is the combination of factors that determine the intrinsic value of a magazine.

          Works of arts becomes more valuable when its artists passed away. The same holds true for things connected to a celebrity, and that includes magazine with him or her on the cover.

Typos and errors on the cover may increase the value of the magazine exponentially.
Celebrity World (July 11, 1994), with the misspelled word,
and Mr. & Ms. (June 25, 1996), with the wrong printed date.

          Typos and errors noticeable on the cover, rare attributes about the featured cover, coincidences, quirks, etc., are also considered intrinsic factors. The more intrinsic factors a magazine has, the higher its value.

          By the way, there seems to be no existing term for “a person who collects magazines,” so allow me to invent one – Periodicophilist, from the Greek words periodikos (periodicals) and philos (loving). The term would literally means “magazine lover.”

 

STILL BEING WRITTEN, NEARING COMPLETION.....




 

THE OTHER SIDES OF STEPHEN HAWKING

THE OTHER SIDES OF STEPHEN HAWKING

          Everybody knows who Stephen Hawking is. Oh maybe not everybody, just around 7/3π² +80 percent. Well, in the film Avengers: Infinity War, you heard Dr. Strange’s assistance, Wong, talked about “singularities.” The term singularity, as well as alternate universe, black hole, and many more words and worlds in the quantum realm are very much akin to him.

          Stephen William Hawking (1942-2018) is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist that will be long-remembered for his works on black holes and the concept union of the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. On the lighter side, for trivia aficionados, he is a man born on the 300th anniversary of Galileo Galilei’s death and died on the 139th anniversary of Albert Einstein’s birth.

          My favorite subject when I was a student were Math and Science. That is why I became an engineer, and I also delved into science journalism. Hawking was among the scientists that I frequently read about. Being also an avid fan of the TV and movie series Star Trek, which is about interstellar travel, I am very much interested in his works.

          During my college days and years after, one of my hobbies is making friends around the world through letter writing. How did they call it during those times? Penpals! What today’s cybergeneration called “snail mail” was the medium of communication between distant acquaintances during those times. Whenever I got hold of an address of a famous personality, whether locally or in other countries, I would try to write to them. Some replied, some didn’t.

          My technique was to first use the address of the institution where the renown personality was working or having an official position. It’s quite effective, as the persons in-charge of media relation of the said institution will either respond to give you the personal or office address of the person you are seeking or they will pass your letter to the intended party. I got lots of mail. Well, I also spent a lot of money for stamps, sometimes, sacrificing my food allowance.

          In return, I had tons of stamps, postcards and greeting cards from different countries. I also had free magazines, brochures, newsletters from different institutions, mostly in the varied science genre, worldwide.

          There’s this one person that I’d hope would correspond but didn’t, initially. His name is Stephen Hawking. I wrote to him sometime in the early 1980s using the address “Department of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, England.” I said, “initially,” because in a turn of events years later, I would encounter “Mr. Singularity” himself in a different medium – the Internet.

          My first online encounter with Stephen Hawking, the science giant, genius of a man, was during the mid-1990s. It was in an online science forum. The prevailing geek fad at the time was AOL, Hotmail and the Usenet’s “alt” groups,  no Google or Facebook yet. I also remembered that I wrote an article – “The Other Sides of Stephen Hawking” –  for one of the magazines I was contributing at the time. I don’t think it was published, though. So I'm trying to recall the contents of that article for this blog post.

          In the science forum, I remember I had a discussion-debate with a person who calls himself Oblivious “something” (I forgot the exact alias). It was about my proposition “Science Proved the Authenticity of the Bible and the Existence of GOD.” I won the debate when he conceded. A few years later, in another science forum, Stephen Hawking admitted that he was that guy. Whoa! In that forum, I was in heated arguments for days with another person who claimed to be a scientist (not Hawking). The argument was about “Creation.” He was for Darwinists, and I was for Biblical Creation. I was presenting scientific proofs – archaeology, geology, genetics, etc. – but all he did was keep giving insults. So, I finally told him that “Enough said. I believe that I was created and born in the image of GOD. Now, if you sincerely believe you were created in the image of apes, you are absolutely free to do so.” I think I got him furious. Then I received a private message, with the tag “Stephen Hawking,” congratulating me for a “nice finishing kick.” He particularly praised me in a way I was both humbled and elated: “You really know your Bible and your science.”

          Of course, at first I didn’t believe that he was Stephen Hawking. Until he proved it. Here is were everything looped (or shall we say, wormholed) back to the penpal days.

          The letter I wrote for Stephen Hawking during my college days was about my interests on black holes and time traveling. As I’ve said earlier, Hawking didn’t reply.

          Now, here’s why and how I believed that who I’m talking with in the science privy chatroom was Hawking. He said the letter I sent him a decade or so ago was passed to him. He read it but didn’t reply. He, however, kept the letter because of something I wrote. I think it was about my conjectures that “the universe was a sphere with a radius approaching infinity,” “it would take a particle of atom traveling a thousand times the speed of light before it can break through the time barrier,” and “inside the black hole, time have no bearing just like before Creation when the component time does not yet exist.”

          For the succeeding weeks, we would chat. He even called my landline number twice and sent me a small card bearing a kitten, which he said, “My grandson told me this looks like me.” Prior to this post, I’ve been scouring my magazine, comics and books collection trying to find where the heck did I insert that card. I also remembered scanning it, but it’s in my old desktop. Maybe one of these days, I’ll open that up and see if I can still retrieve the pic, so I can include it here.

           In the second encounter with him, I learned that we have a lot of interests in common. For one, Mathematics, science (especially Time Dynamics), space travel and similar topics. For the second, you probably wouldn’t believe it – the Bible. You may think that Hawking is an atheist and he said he is in many occasions, but he is very much interested in the written Scriptures, not in finding mistakes or inconsistencies, but more on the mysteries. That intrigued me. He particularly wanted my “analysis” of Genesis, the Book of Daniel, the Gospels (including those not in the Bible) and the Revelation. He asked me many intriguing questions, and he can only do so if he had read the Scriptures thoroughly.

          I’m still in the process of remembering the many things we talked about. There is, however, this question that still lingers in my mind: “What is this ‘new earth’ and ‘new heaven’ mentioned in the Bible? Is the Earth going to be destroyed and a new one created? Where? There’s narration of ascending into heaven, does that mean going ito outer space? Traveling to another habitable planet?” This is just a sample of how interesting and intriguing our conversations were.

          About Genesis, in our earlier discussions and debates about Creation, I particularly got his attention when I said the “Big Bang” was in the Bible. Over and over we went to the same Darwinist argument. But that same argument led to dead ends, and that is why Darwinists, I told him, are “easy to overwhelm in an argument.” Even Hawking admitted that as he was able to follow one of my debates against a Darwinist in a science forum. And there's not much diffrence between a Darwinist and an atheist. Though I seem to remember, one time, he called Charles Darwin a “con artist.” I, however, am not sure if he meant it or was just kidding aside.

          The argument that “life comes from nothing and therefore will return to nothing” (which Hawking initially used as argument) is not an argument at all. I told Hawking that it’s just like the Scriptural passage “From ash thou came, to ash thou shall return,” only on an empty perspective. Let’s assume that “life comes from nothing.” What then caused it? Just like the “Big Bang,” there is always a cause. Science is about cause and effect. There will be no effect without a cause. So what or who cause life to exist? Even in the Big Bang Theory, athiest scientists cannot make an argument. They would just insist, that it started with the fundamental interaction of forces followed by cosmic inflation and the appearance of subatomic particles, then came decoupling, recombination, etc. etc. Again, what or who caused it?

          I told Hawking that the Bible has the answer. In Genesis 1:3, GOD said “Let there be light!” That in my viewpoint is the “Big Bang.” He was stumped for a while that I thought he was searching for the passage or musing about it.

          For our third common interest, exposing the scruples of popes, which we often laugh about, this although he’s a lifetime member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican’s scientific institution. He mentioned in one conversation: “They (Vatican) are saying Galileo was the founding leader of this academy. How can you believe that when they condemned the guy for his science? It took almost 400 years before they admitted their mistakes.” Hawking especially hates pedophile priests, and admitted knowing and meeting some of them, and in a nonchalant way, he said he “would’ve stranggled them if only he could.”

          Foremost that I remembered was our talks about the difference between Christians and Catholics. He initially thought they were “identical planets with the same sun and moon.” Then I told him, “Okay, if you want to put it that way..... Christianity would be the sun and Catholicism will be Pluto..... or in a bigger scale, Christianity is the Big Bang, and Catholicism is most probably be the Dark Rift or just a Bok Globule.” Hawking replied with lots of “lol” on the screen. Then he said (and I would never forget it): “I’m beginning to like you.”

          My third encounter with him was most intriguing. It was around August 2017. I received an email. It was an ordinary google mail. The sender wrote: “This is probably my last challenge to you. ‘If there’s really a God; and if yours is the true God, pray for me and ask for forgiveness in my behalf.’ – Stephen Hawking.” I tried answering him back three times, but he could no longer be reached. The emails I sent keep bouncing back. Less than a year later, he died.

 

 More to come....